I like Rachel Power's Blog. She posts regularly, not often. Each post is worth a read. Her blog style is brief and thought provoking sans provocation.
Below is a link to a post which has had a residual effect on my thoughts. If you've ever been interested in writing bout family or beloved-ones, you may enjoy. I'm clearer on why I don't write about my family than I am about why I'm compelled to do so.
Extract from The Rachel Papers:
The Ethics of Writing about those We Love (click title for full post)
April 5th 2009
"I have found myself having a lot of discussions with people of late about the ethical problems of writing about our families — those thorny issues of boundaries and consent.In her comments section I posted this:
Writers, particularly, rarely avoid writing about the people they are intimate with. So, do we have a responsibility to ask our subjects’ permission to publish material about them, even if fictionalised?"

D said...- And Rachel replied with this:

Rachel Power said...- The Nin quote is worth repeating, if only as an exercise for me to forge it letter by letter for my memory's sake: "...if you are willing to turn the same cold hard lense on yourself that you use in describing others, then it can only be seen as fair."
"I've been arguing a case [in my head] against my mother's murderer. I’m so emotionally conflicted over her death that in my own mind I’ve built a court of law to bring the accused forward to answer for the crime that took our mother from us. Odd but true. The moment I was told that she had killed herself I stopped protecting and defending her behaviour; internally that is.
Externally, we still protect and defend her and on many levels this is killing my brother and I. No-one but us (and my husband) know her real story. She kept a sheer and shiny exterior. I don’t know how, but she did. This lead to our being misunderstood and isolated by mum’s community, bar just a small handful of people who have been brave enough to comfort two devastated and angry adult children.
Grief says: ‘Who the fuck killed my mother? I want justice.’ Then the Truth pops in and says ‘Your mother killed your mother.’ It’s at this point that everything in me splits and I go numb, again. This truth makes my primal self scream. After 2 years the scream has (d)evolved into a muzzled moan.
I point my finger at the accused with a self-righteousness and list all her breeches of moral law: betrayals, lies, conspiracies, stealing, hypocrisies, narcissism, fraud. Then I plot the years, months, weeks and hours leading to the murder to prove that it was indeed murder - not manslaughter or temporary insanity - planed and plotted for years in advance. I show the jury the diaries proving the tragedy no accident, nor a slip in time and rational thinking. My mind’s courtroom is stilled by its empathy for the victim and her family. It’s a grand and emotional scene. They hear of how the victim was a model citizen; a widow, a catholic primary school teacher, the girl next door who married the handsomest Italian in town, who had died from a long, cruel battle with cancer 15 years prior. My mother’s murderer is soon to be proven a-moral, evil and guilty. I turn to the judge and jury as I deliver my final damning statement as an attempt to doom the guilty. But as I turn to deliver the unequivocal truth reality returns. My grief exits stage left and I find that I'm standing alone in an empty room. It’s just little me and big injustice in an empty room, in my own mind, wearing an aftertaste on my bitter, broken breath that mouths "...Oh fuck, the killer got away".
Personal grief-driven mythologies aside, the truth is that all of the above is true. My mother was taken by a brute in cold blood. This brute stole, lied, conspired and plotted then ended my mother's life. She was stolen from us before her time. She was tricked and manipulated. Ultimately she died alone in a hotel room believing that her children didn't love her leaving pages upon pages of bitter letters accusing them as the motive for her death. Whoever the person(a) was who penned these lies and made her sign the letters was indeed without a soul. Some might call it mental illness. I don't care what it was. I only know what happened and I know that it happened in a vacuum bereft of spirit.
The pit of my grief is not that we lost our mum, but that she died alone and without love. I struggle."
Is it wrong to publish this?



12 frank folks find it in their hearts to say::
Wow D! Apart from the fact that your writing is utterly amazing and powerful, and the odd relative may have a problem with it, like you say yourself, "better out than in".
I'm pretty sure I came across your blog from a comment on the same topic on Poppalina. Strong women like you and Shula surely can only be an inspiration to others with a similar life experience.
I vote publish. x
A beautiful post on so many levels from a beautiful woman. I found it lovely that Little Min used the expression used the expression 'better out than in' - my much loved Nana used this expression lots. Sure the written word can be misinterpreted, left for posterity despite changing hearts and views - but also it can act as a record of where we have come from and how we have grown. We can only speak for ourselves and you speak and write with love and bravery. Much love xx
Publish it, like publishing anything, knowing that you could be criticised, but in the strength of knowing that, for you, it is truth. It is a truth well worth telling, in my opinion.
I couldn't stop reading. Well done.
publishing or not, the question is: keep writing!
Te l'ho sempre detto :-)
Hello VAl, lulu, gemma, GG, and Lil Min,
I am going to keep on writing and may periodically post on the topic. Thanks for the encouragement. It means lots especially because the topic is such a stifling space-less thing to me: it needs light and air and room to move and morph. Only the eyes and sentiments of others cam provide this much needed ingredient.
The best thing that has come from posting this extract is that it has depersonalised the topic from me, a tad. Also when I read it, the extended version on my computer, I feel the urge to do some research next, which is always good.
It's true that keeping writing all bottled up just delays the evolution of the idea/topic and impetus to write. I'm expecting that throughout the process of writing that my point of view/position of vision/perspective will shift, and it has already.
Arigato Ladies!!
D
Remember me, I'm L>T I haven't talked to you in forever, but for some reason I was perusing my old blogs that I'd shut down for one personal reason or other.
I came upon your name & decided to see what you were up to...this was a timely topic for me to come upon , because you posting about your mother way back when had so such to do w/me taking a hard look at my own suicidal fantasies. Yor pain made me realize I'd never want to subject my children to the pain i could see you were going through. Don't ever question whether it was the right thing to do. You very well might of saved my life! I have to tell you I'm very happy with a new & fulfilling job, I've gotten two lovely twin granddaughters since those sad times. I have often told the story of my good luck at finding your blog when I did.
Your friend'
L>T aka rita
Hi Rita,
Only three or four days ago I went to 'Thinking Girl' to see if maybe she had started blogging again. I clicked on LT link in her blogroll, hoping to see something of you there ... and within days, here I found you in my in box. And you are Rita, so is my daughter. I'm liking the sync-factor.
I'm a bit shocked by your comment on my post about my mother's suicide. I'm pleased-shocked.
Thankyou.
Back in the early days while I was still writing about mum's death, my bereaved self, it did hurt ... and writing about it helped me too. Now, however, I'm less confused but the pain has only transformed into another kind of pain, a crankier, croakier thing. It's moving and I trust the process. I've learned more than I can process. Am I better person for the experience... ? No I don't think so. I'm clearer, but not better.
The writings of that time when you followed my blog are my only memory of that time. I can barely remember a thing. So your sudden hark from the dark of time past is timely and welcomed, because you are a reminder to me, as I was to you, that shit happens then it dries up, decomposes and helps to push up daisies.
I need to remember to keep on writing this topic outa my veins.
You're a doll ( and I love your name)! ~Thank you! x d
Gemma and Little Min,
You both reminded me that my blog used to be called "Lingo Franko: better out than in".
Maybe it's time I reclaimed my original sub-heading.
mmm.
I think maybe it depends not only on the fairness cold hard lens but on your motivations for turning that lens on others or yourself.
We can write things to understand, to respect, to remember.We can write things to hurt, to damn, to get even.
I think the first is fairer than the other, especially when people can't respond. But sometimes we do write to hurt and we have to forgive ourselves for doing that because sometimes we need to be angry and hurtful, for ourselves.
I don't know what causes some people to go on living & others to pack it up & leave. I think those are very personal questions, that can only be answered individually. Suicide is not that uncommon & the reasons for it are as varied as the methods used to achieve the ends. It's always shocking but it's the deaths that seem senseless & leave the most unanswered questions that hurt the ones left behind worst. It's unfair for sure!
Hi Rita,
Sorry it's taken me so long to respond. Been outa blogosphere for a bit.
We seem to believe that there is a conscious decision to leave life made somewhere along the line in the suidicer's life stream. It's the confusion that comes with that issue, as well as all that you have mentioned above.
My mum left no stone unturned and a papertrail for me to follow, so I don't have that horrid unaanswered question aftermath that many people have.
To be honest, I think that some are born with an unshakable will to live and strive and survive, like people who survive being stuck under rubble for weeks, swim kms for days to get to shore, endure wars and torture. And there are the others. Those who have a wish to leave that is as strong as the above example.
I know that there are a whole heap of people who secretly thought my mother was tough and brave for doing what she did. People think suicidal thoughts all the time.
I don't, never have. I don't get it on any level.
So, I don't really think that what she did was unfair (though I used to). I just think that it was something fucking 'out there' and I don't get it, no matter how much I read about it.
There are those who appreciate being in life, and those who could take it or leave it. It's like religion: some do, some don't. And judging those who are different from me is a horrible waist of energy, weather they are suicidal, muslim, black, lesbian or whatever. I've come to accept it as a category of types; some come with mental illness, some don't (many come with childhood abuse, and I think this is more an issue to focus on than any other).
Anyhoo ... just a thought.
Love to you!
xx
d
Post a Comment